HUMAN BEING IN THE SPACE OF ANTINOMIES

The idea of antithetical human nature and the concept man as a bivalent creature are heuristic to reveal problem being.The traditional antinomic splitting anthropological features into one’s own – another’s, immanent transcendent, freedom necessity, good evil, happiness –misfortune, etc. acquires specific coloring in Ukrainian realities. Purpose is ambivalence image person, which special Methodological basis principles phenomenological description subjective experience, means historical philosophical analysis, hermeneutical methods understanding interpretation.Discussion. These or those modes constitute variability (O.Bollnov, C.Jung, K.Jaspers, J.-P.Sartre, E.Fromm). reasons for mosaic rooted existential inexhaustibility palette. existence overtones antinomies evident studies both domestic classics (V.Lypynsky, I.Franko) modern philosophers (V.Malakhov, D.Sepety), Western thinkers (V.Frankl, V.Tatarkevych, G.Hofstede). Conclusion. Controversial classical opposition necessity turns realities “will” an expressive meaningful constant depressingly deathly “bondage”, tension binarism “freedom death”. “Will” only state acceptable authentically own, native way being spectrum modulations attribute “oneself” oecumene, truly familiar close space, opposed “alien” land, people, language, custom, etc.The parity male female cores quite adequate, since Ukraine Cossacks was embodiment perfect masculinity, “chivalrous nature”, similar chivalry with chivalrous cult foundations (for example, Mother God Virgin Mary). After all, ideology demanded convergence concepts “nobleman” “Cossack” one who “granted liberties knightly people”.Controversial life meaning, disappears, losing signs confrontation turning tense uniqueness constants meaning life, fate, finiteness person whole.The happiness, extrapolating /fate disaster /sorrow (deprivation, misfortune), powerful culture, connotative (after “what kind such fate...”), on hand, “underweight” evil other hand. However, plane, life-meaning ethical component loses its dramatic controversial vector: internal semantic moral selfsufficient value.